Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadia Podoroska vs Andrea Lazaro Garcia Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Podoroska vs Garcia analysis and find out who is favored!
Nadia Podoroska vs Andrea Lazaro Garcia Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Podoroska 1 - 0 Garcia
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Podoroska has won 42.31% of points on their second serve, while Garcia has won 47.37%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Podoroska, in recent form, has won 55.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Garcia has won 61.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.53% and 47.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Podoroska has saved 51.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Garcia has saved 53.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Podoroska has won 52.24% of matches played (W/L 35/ 32), with Garcia winning 69.57% (W/L 32/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Podoroska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 251/ 129), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Garcia has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 73/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Podoroska has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18), where as Garcia has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.85% of matches (W/L 27/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Podoroska winning 1 times and Garcia being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Podoroska winning 2 and Garcia winning 1. The last match between Podoroska and Garcia was at the W25 Getxo, 09-07-2019, First, Clay with Nadia Podoroska getting the victory 7-5 4-6 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Podoroska and Garcia have played a deciding set 1 times, with Podoroska winning 1 times and Garcia 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Podoroska winning 1, and Garcia 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Podoroska has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.6 while Garcia has played against players with an average rank of 292.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Podoroska has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Garcia has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Podoroska has converted 40.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Garcia has converted 52.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
59
Rank
36
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
419
Rank
180
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
62% (383-230)
Career Total W/L
61% (265-169)
46% (13-15)
YTD W/L
79% (27-7)
$1,582,396
Career Prize Money
$121,607
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nadia Podoroska | Andrea Lazaro Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 18 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:23:0 | 3:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (84/128) | 60% (74/124) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (51/84) | 61% (45/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (14/44) | 36% (18/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (8/20) | 53% (8/15) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (61/124) | 49% (63/128) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
66%
(
84 of
128)
1st Serve %
60%
(
74 of
124)
-
Aces
-
18
Double Faults
13
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
32%
(
14 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
49%
(
63 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
126
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadia Podoroska | Andrea Lazaro Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (13/15) | 79% (27/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (29/34) | 73% (55/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (279/298) | 60% (393/265) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 79% (27/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 91 | 143 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:14 | 1:44:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 168.79 | 248.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1154/1733) | 61% (1301/2137) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (716/1154) | 61% (792/1301) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (245/579) | 47% (396/836) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (92/225) | 52% (189/362) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (829/1891) | 52% (1158/2206) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (5/0) | 76% (22/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (13/28) | 82% (27/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 88% (7/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 96% (23/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 4% (23/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (17/3) | 45% (11/5) |
Nadia Podoroska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Nadia Podoroska
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nadia Podoroska
85%
(
81 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
69 of
100)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Tatjana Maria
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nadia Podoroska
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Nadia Podoroska
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Katerina Siniakova
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Nadia Podoroska
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Nadia Podoroska
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Francesca Jones
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
69%
(
71 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
52 of
89)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
65 of
138)
127
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrea Lazaro Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
98)
1
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
10
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Cagla Buyukakcay
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
31
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Angela Fita Boluda
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Laura Hietaranta
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Eva Vedder
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Melania Delai
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Maileen Nuudi
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Lisa Pigato
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Jil Teichmann
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Podoroska Vs Garcia Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nadia Podoroska
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
